logopack.jpg
 
RETURN TO:
PROPHETIC VOICES
 
logogrn.jpg
Forty Years On
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Just forty years ago, in 1967, the American historian Lynn White published his now classic paper The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis. It appeared in the journal Science (vol. 155, pp. 1203-1207) and has been reprinted in a number of subsequent publications. The paper is generally accepted as marking the starting point of the dialogue between religion and environmentalism in the context of the current crisis. Below are some extracts from  Lynn White’s paper in parallel with some quotes from Thomas Berry’s Evening Thoughts (Sierra Club Books, 2006). The similarities are obvious and are a reflection of just little has changed over this period.


Lynn White
1967

Thomas Berry
2006

What did Christianity tell people about their relations with the environment? Christianity inherited from Judaism not only a concept of time as nonrepetitive and linear but also a striking story of creation. By gradual stages a loving and all-powerful God had created light and darkness, the heavenly bodies, the earth and all its plants, animals, birds, and fishes. Finally, God had created Adam and, as an afterthought, Eve to keep man from being lonely. Man named all the animals, thus establishing his dominance over them. God planned all of this explicitly for man's benefit and rule: no item in the physical creation had any purpose save to serve man’s purposes. And, although man’s body is made of clay, he is not simply part of nature: he is made in God's image.

Especially in its Western form, Christianity is the most anthropocentric religion the world has seen. As early as the 2nd century, both Tertullian and Saint Irenaeus of Lyons were insisting that when God shaped Adam he was foreshadowing the image of the incarnate Christ, the Second Adam. Man shares, in great measure, God's transcendence of nature. Christianity, in absolute contrast to ancient paganism and Asia’s religions (except, perhaps, Zorastrianism), not only established a dualism of man and nature but also insisted that it is God's will that man exploit nature for his proper ends.

In Antiquity every tree, every spring, every stream, every hill had its own genius loci, its guardian spirit. These spirits were accessible to men, but were very unlike men; centaurs, fauns, and mermaids show their ambivalence. Before one cut a tree, mined a mountain, or dammed a brook, it was important to placate the spirit in charge of that particular situation, and to keep it placated. By destroying pagan animism, Christianity made it possible to exploit nature in a mood of indifference to the feelings of natural objects.

It is often said that for animism the Church substituted the cult of saints. True; but the cult of saints is functionally quite different from animism. The saint is not in natural objects; he may have special shrines, but his citizenship is in heaven. The spirits in natural objects, which formerly had protected nature from man, evaporated. Man’s effective monopoly on spirit in this world was confirmed, and the old inhibitions to the exploitation of nature crumbled.

Even when we try to bring religious influence to bear on these issues, we find that our religious traditions have little relevance to what is happening. Our Western religions exist in a different world, a world of covenant relations with the divine, a world little concerned with the natural environment or with the Earth community. Our sacred community is seen primarily as one concerned with human-divine relations, with little attraction toward a shared community existence within the larger world of the living. Our iconoclasm is such that we can hardly think of ourselves within a multi-species community or consider that this community of the natural world is the primary locus for the meeting of the divine and the human.

One study done at YaleUniversity found that the more extensively people participate in religious activities, the less likely they are to be concerned with the natural world. The pathos of the human, described so extensively in the prophetic writings, seems to exhaust our religious energies. Religious attention is directed toward moral conduct, social injustice, pietistic practices, and interior meditation experiences.

[In Antiquity] the human experienced itself in integral relationship with the surrounding forces of the universe. Human activities were modelled on the functioning of the larger community of life. Everything possessed its own life principle, its own subjective mode of self-expression. Humans and animals and plants and all natural phenomena were integral within the larger community. There was no ‘it’ in our sense of the word. Every being and every phenomenon was experienced as a ‘thou’.

To alter this primordial sense of continuity throughout the universe seems to have been the basic purpose of biblical revelation. Within the biblical context, the continuity of divine presence with the natural world was altered by establishing the divine as a transcendent personality creating a world entirely distinct from itself. In addition, the continuity of the divine with the human was altered by the establishment of a covenant relationship based on a juridic model. The continuity between the human community and the natural world was altered by identifying the human as a spiritual being in contrast to all other beings. Only the human really belonged to the sacred community of the redeemed. The previous sense of a multi-species community was diminished.