Prophetic Voices
Resources
Home Page
Teilhard de Chardin
 
TopicsLink
OTHER TOPICS

[Teilhard’s] vision of love is a spirituality that celebrates the oneness of creation, a spirituality that acknowledges love as the clearest understanding we have of God, of ourselves, of history, and of the cosmos David Tracy, theologian.

The day will come when after harnessing the ether, the winds, the tides, gravitation, we shall harness for God the energies of love. And on that day for the second time in the history of the world, man will have discovered fire. -from The Evolution of Chastity

Link to the British Teilhard Association

Link to Article: The Cosmos, the Psyche & You by Carter Phipps

Below are two papers about  Teilhard de Chardin
by Ursula King
and Victor Anderson

Rediscovering Fire
Religion, Science and Mysticism
in Teilhard de Chardi
n

By Ursula King
Department of Theology and Religious Studies,
University of Bristol

Reprinted from EarthLight, issue #39, Fall 2000.
By kind permission of the Editor,
K. Lauren de Boer,
EarthLight Magazine
111 Fairmont Avenue
Oakland, CA 94611

http://www.earthlight.org

Teilhard was one of the first scientists to realize that the human and the universe are inseparable. The only universe we know about is the universe that brought forth the human. Teilhard understood this. He understood that the human story and the universe story identified with each other. The immersion into the deep creative powers of the universe is the most direct contact a human can have with the divine. Such is the spirituality that Teilhard makes available to us. A spirituality that is rooted not in the spatial cosmos of Ptolemy, but in the time-developmental universe that the scientists have detected. – Thomas Berry, geologian.


PIERRE TEILHARD DE CHARDIN’S vision was one of consuming fire, kindled by the radiant powers of love. It was a mystical vision, deeply Christian in origin and orientation. Yet it broke through the boundaries of traditional orthodoxies – whether those of science or religion – and grew into a vision which is global in intent.

His deepest desire was to see the essence of things, to find their heart, and probe into the mystery of life, its origin and goal. In the rhythm of life and its evolution, at the centre of the cosmos and the world, Teilhard believed, is a divine centre, a living heart beating with the fiery energy of love and compassion. Now, the heart is really a fleshly reality. But the image of this very flesh, this concentration of living, breathing matter, came to symbolize for Teilhard the very core of the spirit.

His entire outlook on life was profoundly mystical, yet his mysticism was firmly grounded in contemporary scientific research. For Teilhard the mystic, seer, and believer, the immense research efforts and advances of contemporary science, despite their negative side effects and the new ethical problems they cause, ultimately lead to the adoration and worship of something greater than ourselves, to the celebration of and surrender to divinity, to the heart and soul of the world.

Teilhard’s ideas were developed in direct living contact with the world, especially the Earth, the stuff of the Earth. As a scientist in the fields of geology and palaeontology, he was in constant contact with the world of rocks and stones, fossils and bones, plants and animals. But he also was in touch with many different places and peoples. All of these were, for Teilhard, the tangible concrete stuff of the universe.

While he worked on his scientific papers in his laboratory and office, he created most of his religious and philosophical writings in an unusual setting different from most academics, far removed from any library. His first essays were written in the trenches of the First World War, in woods and farmhouses, whenever there was respite from battle. In later years, he often composed the final version of his essays on the long boat journeys between Asia, America, and Europe, or during vacation time in his family home in the old land.

As he wrote in his 1918 essay "My Universe": "It seems to me that every effort I have made, even when directed to a purely natural object, has always been a religious effort. Substantially, it has been one single effort. At all times, in all I’ve done, I’m conscious that my aim has been to obtain the absolute. I would never, I believe, have had the courage to busy myself for the sake of any other end. Science, which means all form of human activity, and religion have always been one and the same thing for me. Both have been, so far as I am concerned, the pursuit of one and the same object."

The turmoil of the war clarified his ambition. It made him realize in a new way, that matter was charged with life and spirit. He felt so deeply, so vividly, a love of matter, of life. Life is never mistaken, he said, either about its route, or its destination.

This interesting quotation points out the twofold way in which Teilhard refers to science. On one hand, he mentions specific natural sciences such as physics and chemistry (which he taught in his early years) and geology and palaeontology, which were his specialities of research. But he also understood science in a much more generalized sense: as any ordered unified effort of inquiry, and as the systematic knowledge arising from such efforts. In this way his approach to an understanding of the universe, of an ordered cosmos, was larger and more comprehensive than that of traditional science.

Teilhard believed that however much science had achieved, analysis alone, if it was not also related to synthesis, was not enough. He criticised science as often being too reductionist, too constricted by little questions without asking bigger ones about direction and meaning – and about philosophical and ethical concerns relating to our responsibilities in being human.

For Teilhard, the universe is not simply an object of scientific inquiry. It is a reality passionately loved and embraced, something alive, throbbing, and pulsating with energy and growth. He refers to the mother Earth, the terra mater, as our matrix and ground. And he refers to the Earth womb from which we grow and in which we have lasting roots; an Earth whose immensity, richness, and diversity of life he approached with deep reverence and a deep sense of wonder.

At the human level, Teilhard’s world is marked by experiences of suffering and joy, warmth and love, celebration and ecstasy. One has to be attuned to the tonality of his feeling, to the metaphors of fire and music, which he so often uses. He speaks about a note, a melody, a sound, a rhythm that beats for him at the heart of the universe. He also speaks of the spark of fire, the glow, the leaping up of flame, the blaze that sets alive and consumes. These attitudes are summed up in a passage of The Heart of Matter, where he writes; "Throughout my life, by means of my life, the world has little by little caught fire in my sight, until aflame all around me, it has become almost luminous from within. Such has been my experience in contact with the Earth. The diaphany of the divine at the heart of the universe on fire. Christ, the heart, a fire capable of penetrating everywhere, and gradually spreading everywhere."

FORGED IN THE TRENCHES

TEILHARD FELT INSPIRED and compelled to write his first essays against the battle fires of the First World War. Almost daily at the boundary of life and death, he sensed an urgency of leaving his intellectual testament. He felt he had seen something new which he wanted to pass on to others. From the very first, he wanted to communicate the fire of his vision.

We can ask, therefore, what is this fire? How was it ignited and kept alive? What does this fire mean, and what energies and powers does it transmit? And how can we discover this fire today, kindle it in ourselves and others, feed it and keep it alive? What does he mean by discovering fire, again, a second time?

The war experience immersed him, as he himself wrote, in a baptism of fire, and proved a crucible in which the full power of this vision was forged. Five years of trench warfare brought all his different experiences together into a single process of spiritual transformation.

It is astonishing the amount of work he managed to get done between all the exhaustion of battle. With heightened sensibility (and some may say, extraordinary detachment) he went for lonely walks between battles and reflected in solitude. What was the meaning of all life, and of his own? Where was God on these fields of death and battle? What was humanity heading for? Where was it going? How did all these diverse human groups on both sides of the battle line ...belong to one human family? What was the role of the Christian faith in the immense cosmic process that is the evolution of life?

He started a journal, made notes, wrote letters, and composed a series of stirring essays. He wrote them for himself, but he also wrote them for the world. For he wanted to make others see what he felt, saw, and believed. His journal contains the seeds of his thought, the initial plans for his essays, later written out with a meticulous hand in full lengths between the spells of battle. The turmoil of the war clarified his ambition. It made him realize in a new way, that matter was charged with life and spirit. He felt so deeply, so vividly, a love of matter, of life. Life is never mistaken, he said, either about its route, or its destination.

In the midst of these terrible battles of the First World War, surrounded by the experience of death, Teilhard opens his first essay with this extraordinary affirmation, "I am writing these lines from an exuberance of life, and the yearning to live. It is written to express an impassioned vision of the Earth, and in an attempt to find a solution for the doubts that beset my action. Because I love the universe, its energies, its secrets, and its hopes, and because at the same time I am dedicated to God, the only origin, the only issue, and the only end. I want to express my love of matter and life, and reconcile it, if possible, with the unique adoration of the only absolute and definitive god-head." ("Cosmic Life" from Writings in the Time of War.)

HARNESSING THE ENERGIES OF LOVE

THE SYMBOLISM OF FIRE was to occur in his writings again and again in the years to come. Nowhere is this vision more radiant and empowering than in the description of his mystical experiences. They truly express a vision of fire which filled him with wonder and amazement, ecstasy and joy, and made him see the world burst into flames. It is this fire which he wanted to pass on and kindle in others. His vision of fire was one of spiritual transformation drawn from the insides of both science and religion. The universe in evolution, studied in great detail in his scientific work, stimulated his zest for being. His Christian faith made him see the universal presence of Christ in all things.

Teilhard loved the Earth and its peoples. He loved his church and his order. And he was filled with the fire of love for the ever-great Christ. For him, the symbol of fire meant the warmth and radiance of love and light, the energy to fuse and transform everything. But fire is, of course, ambivalent. I t can destroy as well as transform. In Teilhard’s understanding, it is the transforming power of the energies of love which alone can create a truly human community and provide it with its strongest points. Thus, the fire of love may be the only energy capable of extinguishing the threat of another fire, namely that of universal conflagration and destruction.

He considered the phenomenon of religion as central to human evolution, and the phenomenon of spirituality as the key element in religion. At the centre of spirituality he perceived the phenomenon of mysticism, which he distinguished into different types. The core of mysticism, the most important and energizing type, was mysticism centred on love, a mysticism of action, which radiated outward and helped to transform and build up the spirit of the world.

Science, religion, and mysticism are always closely intertwined in Teilhard¹s thought, for his science is of central significance to a new mysticism of action and a new understanding of the world. This mysticism of action is the mysticism of unification, of bringing everything, all the diverse elements (the cosmic, human, and divine) together. It is a mysticism of transformation and of sanctification, where holiness is understood as wholeness.

Just a few days before his death, Teilhard wrote his last six pages, which are entitled "Research, Work, and Adoration." One might consider this text his last intellectual testament. In it, he speaks of the conflict between science and religion and its solution. He refers to the fire of a new faith in the human, to be combined with religious faith.

Teilhard endeavoured to seek an ultimate coherence for our manyfold experiences and quests, and tried to convey a vision greater than what either traditional religion or science alone can offer us. From this perspective, religion and mysticism are part of the human search for union or communion with God via the evolutionary process of the growth and unification of the world. All human efforts, whether scientific or religious, whether action or contemplation, must finally lead to worship, adoration, and ultimately greater unity.

If mysticism, especially the mysticism of love, is the very heart of religion, it must provide us with the deepest springs of energy for both action and interaction with others. It cannot be a mere spirit duality, but must stand for spirit-in-and-through-matter mentality. Spiritual development and religious experience are best seen as closely interrelated with and inseparable from our human experience in general. F. C. Happold has remarked that for Teilhard, human activity in all its forms was capable of divinization. And therefore he described Teilhard’s mysticism "as a mysticism of action, action springing from the inspiration of a universe seen as moved and com-penetrated by God in the totality of its evolution...this is a new type of mysticism, the result of a profound, lifelong reconciling meditation on religious and scientific truth, and it is thus of immense relevance and significance for a scientific age such as ours." (Mysticism. Pelican Books, London, 1978, p. 395.)

This is an indication of the importance of this global prophet. But this assessment leaves out the living fire which animated Teilhard’s Christian mysticism, summed up by him as a heart of fire, as "a fire with the power to penetrate all things, which invites a surrender to an active feeling of communion with God through the universe."

Ursula King is professor in the Department of Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Bristol, England, where she directs the Centre for Comparative Studies in Religion and Gender. She has been a student of Teilhard¹s works for more than thirty years and was one of the founders of the British Teilhard Association.

Teilhard de Chardin and Beyond

Victor Anderson

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was a Catholic theologian, disapproved of by the Vatican, who turned out to be one of the great prophetic voices of the 20th Century. We could say that in some ways he understood more deeply than anyone else what the 20th Century was about, and where it fitted in to the long trajectory of life from its beginnings on this planet to our own time and beyond.

Teilhard de Chardin was a palaeontologist, someone who studies prehistoric life. For many years he took part in fossil expeditions in China, and investigated geology. From his study of prehistory, he built up a vision of the evolutionary process as a whole, including the history and future of the human species. That vision encompassed an understanding of what we now call “globalisation”, the increasing interdependence of different parts of the human species in the different parts of the world.

Teilhard was born in 1881 in central France. His parents were pious Catholics, and his father was a small-scale gentleman farmer with an interest in natural history. At the age of 10, he became a boarder in a Jesuit college.

He joined the Jesuit Order itself at the age of 17, and was ordained just outside Hastings, where he studied theology. During his 20s he united his study of theology with his study of natural history, developing the basic vision he was later to elaborate. He combined these interests through becoming Professor of Geology at the Catholic Institute of Paris.

In 1924 he was forbidden to continue teaching students, and forbidden to address public meetings, because of what the Vatican considered unorthodox and unacceptable views. He was also forbidden to have his books published during his lifetime, and was required to spend long periods in exile from France, one of the reasons he did so much work as a palaeontologist in China. He was committed to remaining a Catholic and Jesuit, and in order to remain within the fold, he obediently accepted these restrictions.

The book he wrote which had the greatest impact, The Phenomenon of Man, was not published until 1955, the year he died, even though the manuscript was completed in 1940.

The Phenomenon of Man is a book about evolution, which he describes as “a general condition to which all theories, all hypotheses, all systems must bow”, and as “a light illuminating all facts”1. He calls it “a single and continuing trajectory”2 and “a constantly rising tide”3, predominating over all short-term setbacks and variations.

The most important long-term trend within evolution as a whole is towards greater complexity. There is a trend towards greater complexity in matter, beginning even before living things, and then greater complexity in the development of life. Intertwined with increasing complexity there is increasing consciousness. The two aspects, “the interior” and “the exterior”, go together in what he calls “the great law of complexity and consciousness.”4

Teilhard’s view provides a clear sense of direction, an overall scheme within which many things can be understood. He argues that developments which have not fitted this long-term trend have not persisted, and that we can discern what will and will not persist in the developments of today by seeing which are compatible, and which incompatible, with this dual evolution of increased complexity and greater consciousness.

With human beings, consciousness reaches a new stage. Self-consciousness and abstract thought arrive, and through them, our species develops science, art, technology, and religion. Teilhard calls the sphere of interconnected human thought, linking individuals and different parts of the world, the “noosphere”, distinct from, though growing out of, the pre-existing spheres of the geosphere (the Earth) and the biosphere.

The development of humans is, for Teilhard, in line with the long-run trend towards greater complexity and greater consciousness. He describes it as being on the “privileged axis”5 of evolution. And within the process of human evolution, there is evidence that some parts of human development, and some parts of the world, are on the “privileged axis” and others are not. The Christian West is destined to take the lead, with other religions and forms of life being drawn into its orbit.6

What is all this leading to? “The Omega Point”, as Teilhard envisages it, is a point which will eventually be reached through the continuation of existing trends. Interdependence and increasing unity of consciousness will bring with them the increasing power of love, along with greater consciousness and the increasing power of the human will and ability to take action, expressed largely through advances in technology.

The evolutionary process therefore combines growth at the individual level – involving greater consciousness and sense of self – with growth at the collective level too.

In analysing Teilhard’s thought, it is important to recognise, despite its visionary and future-oriented nature, that it is rooted in traditional Christian theology. Like the good Catholic he was, his writings see the cosmos as one single whole, moving in a particular direction. There is no room here for the temptations of “meaninglessness” or “randomness” or relativism. It all makes sense.

His “Omega Point” sounds a lot like God, even though it is a God which has manifested through time, and partly through the actions of human beings.7

His view of evolution is also grounded very much in Christianity, which – despite parts of it opposing evolutionary ideas - is a religion of incarnation in history, a history with a pattern, running from the Creation, through Garden of Eden and the Crucifixion, to the Kingdom of Heaven. That sense of development makes Christian culture uniquely suited, in Teilhard’s view, to be the soil in which the idea of evolution takes root. Christianity is therefore not inherently antagonistic to evolutionary ideas, as some have argued, but is in a strong sense the basis of them, and so there is a stronger compatibility between evolution and Christianity than there is between evolution and all the other religions.

Another aspect of the incarnational nature of Christianity, the doctrine that God was physically incarnated in this world, is the view that the material world has a spiritual reality and significance. It therefore follows that human actions in the material world, such as work, politics, and family life, all have a spiritual significance.

Teilhard shares the traditional Christian view that Eastern religions have encouraged passivity, fatalism, and rejection of the material world, and are therefore inferior to Christianity. He also argues, however, that Eastern religions have contributed to the evolutionary process through developing profound forms of mysticism at an earlier period than these were developed in the West.

However there is a great deal about Teilhard de Chardin’s ideas which have made him interesting to people outside Christianity. His mystical sense of the unity of all life, including through time, is shared with other traditions, such as forms of Buddhism, paganism, and Sufism. The scope and scale of what his thinking encompasses are inspiring to many who seek a view of the world bigger than simply human history alone.

His sense that the material world, and human actions within it, are significant is widely shared, and interestingly provides a way of seeing a greater significance in politics than is often immediately apparent. This was one of the reasons why Teilhard’s thought proved influential in Christian-Marxist dialogue in the 1960s, for example through the writings of the leading French Communist Party intellectual Roger Garaudy.8

The framework Teilhard set out provides a means of locating and understanding a wide range of current historical phenomena. These include globalisation, and associated with it, the postmodern availability of ideas and styles from all times and places, and the growing power of information and communication technologies. His writings about the first half of the 20th Century, in which he sees totalitarianism, of both fascist and Stalinist varieties, as a sort of crude form of collectivism not properly rooted in the individual personality, provide an interesting basis for thinking about totalitarianism’s rise and fall, and why it didn’t last. His view of humanity’s evolutionary continuity with other life forms also provides a fruitful basis for thinking about key current problems such as climate change and the extinction of species.

His scheme of ideas is a flexible one: although he provides a particular picture, it lends itself to being adapted for other purposes, emphasising one or other element. This has given his thinking a great deal of influence, amongst not only those who consciously follow his thought, but also amongst many who have read the writers he has influenced, without necessarily being particularly aware of where their basic ideas came from. For example, Teilhard de Chardin was a major influence on Thomas Berry and Brian Swimme (e.g. in their wonderful book, The Universe Story)9, Marshall McLuhan (e.g. in Understanding Media)10, and Peter Russell (Awakening Earth)11.

At the same time, however, Teilhard de Chardin’s thinking is deeply problematic, even though some of those he has influenced have adapted it positively and creatively ways. This has been achieved partly through interpreting his works in a way which turns a blind eye to their frequently expressed Catholic piety, emphasising instead his scientific and historical vision.

Berry and Swimme have made an ecological philosophy out of this stream of thought, but that was not Teilhard’s own emphasis.12 He underplays the fragility inherent in humanity’s dependence on the biosphere at a time when human activity is increasingly destructive. His discussion of evolution and progress expresses a technological triumphalism which is out of place now, though much more in tune with the mood of the times when he was writing, in the first half of the 20th Century.

An extreme example of his optimism about technology is this welcome he gave to the atom bomb: “For all their military trappings, the recent [nuclear] explosions … proclaim the coming of the Spirit of the Earth”.13

His version of evolution is one in which humanity is central to such an extent that he describes most animal phyla (other than the vertebrates) as “a thicket of abortive branches”14.

Although his theology provides a basis for valuing family life, personal relationships, human love, and embodiment in the material world, he argued in favour of the doctrine of chastity, which he saw as part of the process of human love becoming less dependent on the flesh. His own relationships were lived according to this doctrine, including his long-standing Platonic friendship with American artist Lucile Swan.

He obediently accepted, throughout his life, the restrictions on his writing and speaking placed on him by the Catholic Church, restrictions which many other people would have taken as sure evidence of the need to leave the Church.15

Like some other evolutionary thinkers, such as Ken Wilber, he has not written about capitalism or analysed the extent to which the dynamics of the capitalist economy shape the development of science, technology, communications, and politics. “Progress” is seen as almost an autonomous agent of change, rather than being structured and organised by particular economic systems at different times and stages of development.

He wrote at a great distance from the politics of his time, largely because he was in exile studying fossils in China at a time when his fellow French intellectuals were debating existentialism, Marxism, fascism and so on. He was therefore ill-equipped to contribute in a well-informed way to some of the issues of his time - although perhaps his distance from them has made him better equipped to contribute to the debates of our own time.

His emphasis on evolution, though inspirational in the sweep of its big picture, brings with it the danger of downplaying cyclical factors, such as the seasons, which are celebrated in neopagan and other calendars, and archetypal factors, such as those explored in Greek mythology and Tarot.

However, the various thinkers whose work has been influenced by Teilhard demonstrate some strategies for adapting and adjusting his framework of ideas, and making something more whole out of them. For example, his view of humanity’s evolution out of other species can be turned into an ecological view of our continued dependence, without doing too much violence to his basic ideas. His optimistic view of technological progress could also be tempered by a sense that technology is always shaped, and to some extent limited, by the specific nature of the economic system in which it develops. Similarly, his sense of what we now call “globalisation” is compatible with, and in some ways finds a fuller expression in, a universalism about the different contributions being made by different cultures and religions, rather than the Western and Christian emphasis which Teilhard himself had.

In all these and many other ways, we can “make our own Teilhard”. The most influential thinkers are the ones who leave us the materials from which to create new thoughts of our own.

NOTES

1. Teilhard de Chardin: The Phenomenon of Man (Harper & Row). 2nd ed 1965, page 219.

2. ibid, page 34.

3. ibid, page 101.

4. ibid, page 61.

5. ibid. page 142.

6. ibid, page 296.

7. Some similarities here with the philosophy of Hegel. See Emil L Fackenheim: The Religious Dimension in Hegel’s Thought (University of Chicago Press 1967).

8. See Roger Garaudy: From Anathema to Dialogue (Collins 1967).

9. Thomas Berry & Brian Swimme: The Universe Story (Penguin 1994). A similar view, linked with James Lovelock’s Gaia hypothesis rather than with Teilhard de Chardin, is set out in Elisabet Sahtouris:“Gaia: the human journey from chaos to cosmos (Simon & Schuster 1989).

10. Marshall McLuhan:  Understanding Media (Sphere 1967). In the Introduction, he says: “Today, after more than a century of electric technology, we have extended our central nervous system itself in a global embrace, abolishing both space and time as far as our planet is concerned. Rapidly, we approach the final phase of the extensions of man – the technological simulation of consciousness, when the creative process of knowing will be collectively and corporatedly extended to the whole of human society …” (page 11). 

11. Peter Russell: “Awakening Earth” (Routledge & Kegan Paul 1982).

12. Thomas Berry was President of the American Teilhard Association. See Thomas Berry: Teilhard in the Ecological Age (American Teilhard Association for the Future of Man 1982). See also Sarah McFarland Taylor: Green Sisters (Harvard University Press 2007).

13.Teilhard de Chardin: “The Future of Man” (Collins 1964), page 147.

14. Teilhard de Chardin: “The Phenomenon of Man”, page 132.

15. See Matthew Fox: Confessions: the making of a postdenominational priest (HarperCollins 1997). This includes Fox’s account of why, in circumstances in some ways similar to those faced by Teilhard de Chardin, he did decide to leave the Roman Catholic Church.